>>95858513
Literally every argument he makes ignores what was said. The party used that money to start a god damn military coup rather than going back for more fish.

They chose to engage in further adventures, despite the higher risk involved.

His entire argument is 'Players are animals, you need to beat them with a stick to get them to perform'
I'd call it intellectually dishonest but I don't think he's capable of being honest.

Oh and of course
>They were trying to out-fish the fishermen
The fishermen they were collecting because the entire area was being abandoned.
Who helped them gather the fish by the sound of it as a sort of improv reward for helping them and their families presumably.

It's absurd, how can anyone do this for 6 months straight without ever once having an actually a well made and thought out point.
Surely you'd have to stumble across one by chance eventually right?