Search Results
6/29/2025, 9:06:34 AM
>>5008755
>They're look like theyre around 7-8ft tall. Google says they're not that tall but I saw what I saw
My guess is that as being really new to horses you took their head height into account.
The official numbers are calculated only from the withers which results in way lower numbers. Many horses would bump their heads on even really tall roofs but yeah, the official numbers are way less spectacular looking and are deceiving since they do not take the head into account.
>They're look like theyre around 7-8ft tall. Google says they're not that tall but I saw what I saw
My guess is that as being really new to horses you took their head height into account.
The official numbers are calculated only from the withers which results in way lower numbers. Many horses would bump their heads on even really tall roofs but yeah, the official numbers are way less spectacular looking and are deceiving since they do not take the head into account.
6/29/2025, 9:04:30 AM
>>5008755
>They're look like theyre around 7-8ft tall. Google says theyre not that tall but I saw what I saw
My guess is that as being really new to horses you took their head height into accounts.
The official numbers only calculated from the withers which results in way lower numbers. Many horses would bump their heads on even really tall roofs but yeah, the official numbers are way less spectacular looking and are deceiving since they do not take the head into account.
>They're look like theyre around 7-8ft tall. Google says theyre not that tall but I saw what I saw
My guess is that as being really new to horses you took their head height into accounts.
The official numbers only calculated from the withers which results in way lower numbers. Many horses would bump their heads on even really tall roofs but yeah, the official numbers are way less spectacular looking and are deceiving since they do not take the head into account.
Page 1