>>81660995
Overpriced isn't objective, math isn't objective either but I don't even have to argue that I just wanted to mention that.

We aren't arguing over what constitutes overpriced to begin with it's over what constitutes bad. Bad is a choice.

>I still don't see how good is maximized in that system

Yeah because you chose contradicting principles again lol. I don't mean to laugh like being mean or anything but that cracked me up ngl. Well in your example you'd be contradicting yourself and therefore evil. It's not enough to simply change your principles, like I said we are aiming to make them not contradict. I will also say out of all these conversations I find this one the most fun, because it is genuinely interesting watching your brain try to use intersubjective consistency (Ti).

And as you are probably starting to realize you cannot get what you want because of worldly limitations and then you will feel the need to moralize the fact that you are limited, or even, about to be destroyed. This is a very human sentiment. It is Fi in action and contrary to how I usually portray it, quite an innocent reaction. That is also why enlightenment or the absence of expectations is so hard to achieve. Changing your principles to keep yourself from moralizing and thus creating evil, regardless of how fair the world is to you, is the most mature thing one can do.

What the logic looks like when applied:

https://youtu.be/H0lLxZMK-E8?si=YeExnwIcO1-P4fWR

>>81661014
What is that last paragraph attempting to say lol. I'm not even going to try to decipher that.