>>105986851
>4090 was 50% of 3090
More like 70%+ on average, nearing 100% in some outliers (CP2077 RT for instance). 4090 was a huge perf leap, 5090 in comparison is quite terrible and one of the lowest perf gains per generation in the last 10+ years, especially if you take into account that it uses 150W more than the 4090 and doesn't really come with any new features.