>>507714270
>destroyed his bromance with Musk
>bullied Tucker
>humiliated Tulsi
>slandered the Intelligence Community
>who's next

how did he humiliate tulsi?

>>507702315

If Iran detonated a nuclear warhead in Tel Aviv, the United States would face immense pressure to respond due to its alliance with Israel, but direct engagement would depend on several factors. The U.S. would likely prioritize immediate support for Israel, including humanitarian aid, military defense enhancements, and intelligence sharing. A direct military response against Iran would hinge on evidence of Iranian intent, the scale of the attack, and global reactions.
The U.S. has historically avoided full-scale war with Iran, favoring sanctions, cyberattacks, and proxy conflicts, as seen in past tensions (e.g., Soleimani's assassination in 2020). However, a nuclear attack would cross a red line, likely triggering a NATO or UN-backed coalition response rather than unilateral U.S. action. Domestic political will, risk of escalation (e.g., Russian or Chinese involvement), and Iran's nuclear capabilities would also shape the decision.
No direct historical precedent exists, but the U.S. response to 9/11 suggests a high likelihood of retaliatory strikes, potentially targeting Iranian nuclear sites or leadership. Full invasion seems less probable due to Iran’s terrain, military strength, and regional alliances. The U.S. would weigh global economic fallout (e.g., oil market disruptions) and the risk of nuclear escalation.
Ultimately, while direct engagement is probable, the form—strikes, cyberattacks, or coalition-led action—would depend on strategic calculations and international consensus.

>>507657983
Ive always wanted dead shitskins and no Iran isn't allowed to have nukes. So sorry not sorry. Welcome to the non rules based order world.

SOON

>>507430316
SOON

>>507293694
Iran is gonna be stupid because brown and bomb US bases and then the US will bomb them. You should at least keep an eye on it.