>>149396210
People are hand-waving the shitty application of the 60s aesthetic by saying
>wow look at how they're blending the 60s with the modern, future aesthetic
as if it doesn't just look like a half-assed attempt at doing something vaguely 60s inspired. Those fake adverts look like stock photos of the actors with a gritty filter put on top and you have sheep claiming they look anything close to authentic ads of the tome.