>>715084643
Gamers are retarded and their ideas are unworkable.

Not one gamer has been able to answer
>Let's say stop killing games passes
>now lets say roblox wants to shut down
>what would "keeping the game from being completely unplayable" ACTUALLY, AND SPECIFICALLY obligate Roblox to do?

Without retard memes like "lol they should be shut down anyways", because you're retarded if you think
>we just don't prevent you from using the client or actively take it away
means much without support for anything the client does, including all the servers that client connects to, not supporting the routing server for backend netcode, not supporting any official servers handling game asset downloading, accounts, transactions, and all the actual grease and pipework that a game company is constantly supporting on a project like that.

If what you actually want is
>A protected right to reverse engineering to support private servers, so the fans can do all that themselves
fine, but if the company's dead, you can already do that, and if it's not, no country that actually cares about enforcing copyright law is ever going to approve that because you're necessarily going to be serving a fuckton of the company's copyrighted content as part of the project.

Go get mad at international copyright law in the digital space: if this shit's your baliwick and you fix that, you don't need a campaign to 'stop killing games'.