Search Results
6/30/2025, 4:30:11 AM
>>714043458
Its just a poor excuse for bad animation. Invincible recently did something similar where they basically said:
>animation is hard and time-consuming we cut corners and take shortcuts do not criticize us!
The fact that people at one point handrew hundreds of cartoons in the 1930's with less money and limited technology compared to now but a bunch of bluehairs and faggots can't do it with taxpayers money is mindblowing.
Its just a poor excuse for bad animation. Invincible recently did something similar where they basically said:
>animation is hard and time-consuming we cut corners and take shortcuts do not criticize us!
The fact that people at one point handrew hundreds of cartoons in the 1930's with less money and limited technology compared to now but a bunch of bluehairs and faggots can't do it with taxpayers money is mindblowing.
6/30/2025, 4:30:11 AM
>>936441745
Its just a poor excuse for bad animation. Invincible recently did something similar where they basically said:
>animation is hard and time-consuming we cut corners and take shortcuts do not criticize us!
The fact that people at one point handrew hundreds of cartoons in the 1930's with less money and limited technology compared to now but a bunch of bluehairs and faggots can't do it with taxpayers money is mindblowing.
Its just a poor excuse for bad animation. Invincible recently did something similar where they basically said:
>animation is hard and time-consuming we cut corners and take shortcuts do not criticize us!
The fact that people at one point handrew hundreds of cartoons in the 1930's with less money and limited technology compared to now but a bunch of bluehairs and faggots can't do it with taxpayers money is mindblowing.
Page 1