>>64005673
>>64005690
I love when retards assume that the 1950s were totally the same as today. The fal was brand new, and did not work worth a blue fuck in the sand or the cold. Do you know why they had to add those giant sandcutters on later fal models? Because the guns simply did not run without them, among other problems.
In the late 1950s there were still heated debates between even issuing a weapon that used disposable magazines, let alone an unproven and unreliable belgian gun in an abysmal caliber.

you are not smarter than the men who made these decisions. you are an internet retard who hasn't even read first hand accounts of what happened and why.