Actual proof of Christianity
>confirmed by x-ray dating in 2022 to be from the 1st century
>the only photo negative in existence created prior to the invention of photography and it's 1800 years before
>would require an immensely powerful burst of light, impossible for 1st century humans
>no traces of paints or dyes or pressure gradients from rubbing
>bears exact wounds of Jesus as described in the gospels
There is no rational explanation except that this is a photograph of the moment of the resurrection

Still haven't seen a halfway convincing atheist explanation for this, our actual literal photograph of Jesus Christ at the moment of His resurrection
The usual responses:
>it's a medieval forgery
Wrong. This was previously believed due to a flawed carbon dating done in 1988. There has since been x-ray dating that has confirmed it to be from the 1st century. https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9408/5/2/47
>uhh the projection is wrong, it shouldn't be straight on like that if the shroud was draped over him
I don't know why the projection is like that but how is that an argument for a naturalistic origin? Does it in any way begin to explain how humans in the 1st century(or at any point prior to the invention of photography) produced a photo negative of a man with Jesus's wounds? Not at all, that part is a mystery regardless of the nature of its origin.