>>8676151
I haven't come across anything like that; it's probably your timeline and algo. But people need to understand that when it comes to being pro-free speech, you must be all in.

>>8676393
>People are in favor of it. The fucking current admin has support from half the country to do it if they want to. in less than 4 years every red state will have anti-porn laws.
I don’t know. National anti-porn bills have been shot down for decades because they're unconstitutional (not that there isn't a chance it may slip past at some point, but its' history isn't in favor of anti-porn fuckers as they think). Leaders and admins have always been hypocritical of such laws; very few, if none, come without a loophole. The reason they don't bother going after so many people is because it's too much effort and cops don't have resources to go after harmless drawings. Remember when the FBI told people to stop flooding their tip line with "ZOMG, THIS GUY DREW CHILD PORN"?.

>>8676993
In fairness, it took long enough for people to start waking up and flooding the CC call centers when it affected furries and LGBTBBQs. Besides, lefties are quick to backstab anybody who goes against their agenda with the slightest centrist opinion.

>>8677088
This site's got some handy blurbs. There isn't really any right or wrong answer, just waste their time as much as you can even if they hang up.
https://stop-paypros.neocities.org