Search Results
7/10/2025, 1:48:26 PM
>>126990412
best album in the world
best album in the world
6/23/2025, 3:25:24 AM
>>3789119
I agree. They're obviously putting a much more negative emphasis on Arthur, the Round Table, and Kamelot as a whole. That much wasn't a point of contention for me. My entire point was that you're picking a lesser of two evils, and you have hardly any actual, in-setting information on Kamelot, Arthur, and the Round Table at the point of that decision whereas you know Brandean is a power-hungry retard who's let the Horns get completely fucked over and know little more about One-Eye and his group than
>they oppose Kamelot
>dude tribal barbarians in tune with the wyrd lmao
and the fact that they made you drink a potentially fatal concoction to gain a meeting with him and sent a vulgar message in rune carvings as their diplomatic gift (depending on what you chose).
Galahad is obviously a zealot, yeah, but he seems to obviously fall into the role of "vicious attack dog who gets let off the leash when needed" and retains a relatively sound mind. That's not a huge detraction in the grand scheme of things compared to unknown barbarians and a captain who wants more power than he already has yet can't even function with what he's got. That's all.
I agree that, other things being equal, a morally grey/black Round Table is significantly more interesting than them being pure good boys though.
>Kamelot with a "k" being edgy
Never even crossed my mind kek. I just associate it with the band every time it comes up.
>>3789146
And that information isn't available when you're on that quest. You don't even see the experimentation stuff until the cutscene after touching Excalibur. Same shit with Sewal. You only get that expanded info on that (in act 1 anyway) through siding with One-Eye. I don't know why you're acting like I'm trying to defend Arthur's and Merlin's transgressions when all I'm saying is that you have extremely lopsided information when choosing between the captain and Galahad. Almost anything substantively against Kamelot comes after that quest lmao.
I agree. They're obviously putting a much more negative emphasis on Arthur, the Round Table, and Kamelot as a whole. That much wasn't a point of contention for me. My entire point was that you're picking a lesser of two evils, and you have hardly any actual, in-setting information on Kamelot, Arthur, and the Round Table at the point of that decision whereas you know Brandean is a power-hungry retard who's let the Horns get completely fucked over and know little more about One-Eye and his group than
>they oppose Kamelot
>dude tribal barbarians in tune with the wyrd lmao
and the fact that they made you drink a potentially fatal concoction to gain a meeting with him and sent a vulgar message in rune carvings as their diplomatic gift (depending on what you chose).
Galahad is obviously a zealot, yeah, but he seems to obviously fall into the role of "vicious attack dog who gets let off the leash when needed" and retains a relatively sound mind. That's not a huge detraction in the grand scheme of things compared to unknown barbarians and a captain who wants more power than he already has yet can't even function with what he's got. That's all.
I agree that, other things being equal, a morally grey/black Round Table is significantly more interesting than them being pure good boys though.
>Kamelot with a "k" being edgy
Never even crossed my mind kek. I just associate it with the band every time it comes up.
>>3789146
And that information isn't available when you're on that quest. You don't even see the experimentation stuff until the cutscene after touching Excalibur. Same shit with Sewal. You only get that expanded info on that (in act 1 anyway) through siding with One-Eye. I don't know why you're acting like I'm trying to defend Arthur's and Merlin's transgressions when all I'm saying is that you have extremely lopsided information when choosing between the captain and Galahad. Almost anything substantively against Kamelot comes after that quest lmao.
Page 1