>>96044743
>Do you want to try the Cover-based Evasion as well?
We can try it. One issue I've been thinking about is how that would affect melee list disproportionately, especially the Amazons would need to be redone if we went with this.
>>96044737
>"You" as in "we"? A different person (me) made the og maps, so the fault for MegaAtlan lies squarely on me.
My bad, the maps were pretty consistent, and yeah somehow I had in mind that on the OG 4th map Atlan was somewhat smaller, but it really isn't, its fucking massive as well.
>>96044737
>The reason I did it was because of the entrance placement on the Third
This is what I expected, also why the "split up" Atlan didn't bother me so much, some land is just so much more valuable than other.
>To be fair, I pointed this problem myself, but seemingly nobody cared enough about it.
Well at least I'm glad I'm not the only one that sees it.
And to be clear, this has nothing to do with hating on Atlan. I like Atlan very much as a faction, I think they fill a necessary spot. Having them be smaller doesn't mean I want them weaker, in my mind being smaller and standing against gigantic odds underscores more their strength than having a fuck huge territory.
>>96045343
>>96045343
>Are Crimean Vets supposed to be cavalry or not?
Good catch, they are meant to have horses as an option, it is missing from their optional equipment list, will add on.