Search Results
6/4/2025, 7:11:11 PM
This modernist "Nogaems" elitism is so lame.
First of all, who gets to determine whats a game or not? It literally is all arbitrary. This is just complaining about someones technique, when the only thing that matters is the execution. I've played and ran both types of games, and I've always had far more fun in games grounded with mechanics, but that only use them for that, a foundation--where the GM has the BALLS to run the kinda game exactly as he sees it instead of constantly checking in on the "rules" to see if he's doing it "right".
What kinda lame shit is that? Run the GAME you want to run and if you dont like it how about just running your own the way you want to without feeling this insecure need to attack the other about it.
Give it a rest TBE. This is just pathetic.
A great adage comes to mind, "Losers focus on winners. Winners focus on winning." If you find yourself complaining about bullshit more than contributing content you are the problem, not the solution.
First of all, who gets to determine whats a game or not? It literally is all arbitrary. This is just complaining about someones technique, when the only thing that matters is the execution. I've played and ran both types of games, and I've always had far more fun in games grounded with mechanics, but that only use them for that, a foundation--where the GM has the BALLS to run the kinda game exactly as he sees it instead of constantly checking in on the "rules" to see if he's doing it "right".
What kinda lame shit is that? Run the GAME you want to run and if you dont like it how about just running your own the way you want to without feeling this insecure need to attack the other about it.
Give it a rest TBE. This is just pathetic.
A great adage comes to mind, "Losers focus on winners. Winners focus on winning." If you find yourself complaining about bullshit more than contributing content you are the problem, not the solution.
Page 1