>>530417534
alright, first thing is i don't watch MBT so i don't know what his deck is like but i will say, fiendsmith is correct.
there's many ways to play this deck (i like magikey impcantation and libromancer dogmatika slops) but as always the best build is the one that copes the hardest.
i'm still gonna bet we build our decks very differently.
now, before i explain the innerworkings let me preface this by saying 2 things:
>this is a RITUAL DECK
not a zombie deck.
>the deck is not in a good place right now.
all because some konami TCG intern thought it would be so hecking wholesome and soulful if dark necromancer, a blantantly vendread card, was not actually a vendread card, so you can't search with the fucking vendread e-tele (vendread charge) that has no good target.
so my mindset here is trying to build around that with copes (small world and gale dogra). since i'm very 1 card combo and consistency oriented, in the sense that i don't mind running bricks , if it means i can actually see the cards that start my combo more.
i play small world because most cards bridge to dark necromancer (that's one the random one of veiler is for), and gale dogra because he's the only other 1 card combo in the deck.
your main lines are:

>dark necromancer
1 card combo into slayer that banishes monster and S/T, s:p little knight, photon lord, and either fiendsmith fusion or caesar.
nibiru proof
>diviner
2 card combo, needs diviner + either slayer or revendread evolution
gets you crystal wing, slayer with both effs, and either caesar/desirae.
nibiru proof
>gale dogra
this one is ok 1 card combo but gets better on 2 card combos onwards., gets you:
vendread slayer, caesar or desirae, and the vendread trap (reorigin)
not nibiru proof but you still get the trap and slayer through nibiru (you just lose the fiendsmith play)

now for decks weakneses
>too many to get into
it's just a casual deck and i'm at character limit anyway. will post webms.