Search Results
6/12/2025, 6:45:12 AM
>>11308732
Yeah I don't like gender based justifications for slavery either. Was more talking about the idea of a sexual service only slavery likely to be gender based, but the idea of a slavery society being based on what I actually think separates slaves from Master's deserves elaboration. It's not gender.
Basically the idea is that you'd never see a slave do actual work at a office, at best help out the people there with domestic service, since administrative tasks like that are left to people who can actually see more than just what is in front of them. slaves would do the most menial of tasks, but no more. There's this recognition that slaves are that way because of being highly emotional and in need of leadership. So Masters do so much for them by actually going out and doing the hard job of thinking. Even in ancient times such a culture would still think that a mine overseer has the hardest job, his tools are absolutely nothing without his guidance. The fact that if you map current dom/sub ratios onto this society it'd be like 80% slaves would also help out with the whole "It's leadership that makes people people, most people aren't" justifications this world would have.
Ultimately though a big slave society like this is just really good for normalizing a slavery lifestyle which isn't normal in our own world. Being a domestic slave and looking at a free woman and knowing that her life is one of agency and freedom, and knowing that she has that because why you are a slave has nothing to do with what you superficially share in common, and everything to do with what you really are deep down, is a level of experiencing what being a slave is in so much more totality than "Oh you've got boobs so you aren't free".
slaves are also way smarter than the teasing they get gives them credit for. Surprisingly so in some locked in cases. It's the fact that they really wish they could be completely head empty that makes their lives best suited to be someone elses.
Yeah I don't like gender based justifications for slavery either. Was more talking about the idea of a sexual service only slavery likely to be gender based, but the idea of a slavery society being based on what I actually think separates slaves from Master's deserves elaboration. It's not gender.
Basically the idea is that you'd never see a slave do actual work at a office, at best help out the people there with domestic service, since administrative tasks like that are left to people who can actually see more than just what is in front of them. slaves would do the most menial of tasks, but no more. There's this recognition that slaves are that way because of being highly emotional and in need of leadership. So Masters do so much for them by actually going out and doing the hard job of thinking. Even in ancient times such a culture would still think that a mine overseer has the hardest job, his tools are absolutely nothing without his guidance. The fact that if you map current dom/sub ratios onto this society it'd be like 80% slaves would also help out with the whole "It's leadership that makes people people, most people aren't" justifications this world would have.
Ultimately though a big slave society like this is just really good for normalizing a slavery lifestyle which isn't normal in our own world. Being a domestic slave and looking at a free woman and knowing that her life is one of agency and freedom, and knowing that she has that because why you are a slave has nothing to do with what you superficially share in common, and everything to do with what you really are deep down, is a level of experiencing what being a slave is in so much more totality than "Oh you've got boobs so you aren't free".
slaves are also way smarter than the teasing they get gives them credit for. Surprisingly so in some locked in cases. It's the fact that they really wish they could be completely head empty that makes their lives best suited to be someone elses.
Page 1