>>11316131
>I think there were some tribes that were matriarchal,
Depends, how do you define matriarchy? I can tell you about the Iroquois (and general North American Indians) but not much else. The way they had it arranged was that Women had a lot of pull. And were regarded as the heads of the household who took the decisions. Even if men where the ones who held political office, went to war, etc. Which is, imo, the way I think most of these societies would go, with a clear segmentation of roles and spaces between male and female, even if female roles are give much more importance. I also think that even if minoritarian, there would realistically be an outlet for people who do not necessarily fit the mould. In my mind this would usually take the form of monasticism in agrarian sedentary societies, perhaps even non-sedentary societies. Ask me if you are curious.

>IDK, why do guys have oedipal complexes?
It's to be expected if your fetish has women in a position of power an authority over men. Some are going to show up.
I am starting to realize this worldbuilding excercise reveals how we individually view women than anything else.