Search Results
7/5/2025, 11:36:53 PM
>>509601730
>>509601875
I very much doubt NSDAP or a similar party arising in the UK would allow Pakistani rape gangs, not sure what your point is, though I'm sure it was very "rational".
>>509601875
I very much doubt NSDAP or a similar party arising in the UK would allow Pakistani rape gangs, not sure what your point is, though I'm sure it was very "rational".
7/1/2025, 6:59:39 AM
Any argument where it is obvious at least 1 side doesn't give a shit what the truth is.
When you have like 2 scientists working on a project and discussing a hypothesis, it is different. They each accept the basic underpinnings of the science due to their years of study and are talking about some obscure technical detail.
However when you have people fail to acknowledge even the middle school tier basics of a subject, then you know the "debate" will literally go nowhere. Even if the other side is honest, they are stupid for not realizing it, or at least changing their tone and saying "because you refuse to accept this basic fact of the matter, I have no choice but to assume this is bait, so I'm done, sorry".
In some cases an argument is for an audience, so the honest one will continue to debate to make it more clear the other side is full of shit, but this is rarely the case on the internet or a conversation between 2 people. An intelligent person will quickly realize this is just a power struggle, that the talking is pointless, that it boils down to darwinism and strength not debate and principles like rationality or a mutual desire to arrive at the truth.
When you have like 2 scientists working on a project and discussing a hypothesis, it is different. They each accept the basic underpinnings of the science due to their years of study and are talking about some obscure technical detail.
However when you have people fail to acknowledge even the middle school tier basics of a subject, then you know the "debate" will literally go nowhere. Even if the other side is honest, they are stupid for not realizing it, or at least changing their tone and saying "because you refuse to accept this basic fact of the matter, I have no choice but to assume this is bait, so I'm done, sorry".
In some cases an argument is for an audience, so the honest one will continue to debate to make it more clear the other side is full of shit, but this is rarely the case on the internet or a conversation between 2 people. An intelligent person will quickly realize this is just a power struggle, that the talking is pointless, that it boils down to darwinism and strength not debate and principles like rationality or a mutual desire to arrive at the truth.
Page 1