>>11316460
>>11312299
>woke internet journalists complaining videogames aren't sexualized enough
>anti-woke podcasters complaining videogames are too sexualized now

I like this idea - if I take 'woke' to basically mean pro-female power in this world.

Going off of what I was saying above, a female character in a game or anime or whatever wearing a revealing outfit and being really sexy would be seen as kinda flexing on males, like an assertion of dominance. Instead of "she's clearly designed to be a slut for the male audience" it would be "she looks like she eats boys for breakfast!"

Not sure if anyone gets what I'm saying or is on the same wavelength. Basically I just like to imagine that
Male Sexuality and arousal = inherently submissive, and treated as such socially
Female Sexuality and arousal = inherently dominant and aggressive, and treated as such socially.

Basically just a bit of a reversal from normal sexuality IRL.