>>528626260
>I disagree.
>>528625432
>not really.
What mongoloid ESL doesn't understand the concept of opinions?
>a satire of GTA
You are actually brain dead.

Testing Mistral 3.2, directly compared to 3.1 in a few creative contexts (both SFW and ERP, long and short contexts)
>Repetition errors: Small-3.2 produces less infinite generations or repetitive answers
They definitely succeeded in making it making it less repetitive. Outputs are clearly more varied, both in variety of the answer itself and the formatting it's presented in. Almost like using a higher temp but without the model getting dumber as a trade-off.
>Instruction following: Small-3.2 is better at following precise instructions
I already found 3.1 pretty good in this regard, 3.2 seems to is certainly not worse but not sure if it's necessarily better.
I don't use function calling so I can't say anything on this point.
It doesn't seem to have any additional censorship/safety training, either in text or image recognition.
Overall, it's been a small but solid improvement for me and I'll probably delete 3.1 soon, 3.2 surpasses it with no apparent downsides.