>>63894844
No shit. But has there been any specific program that yielded nothing but explosions and shooting stars? 13 years and billions of dollars down the road? Promising to deliver interplanetary results NEXT YEAR? A moon lander THIS YEAR? Which does such 1960's shit, despite upgrades, as exploding while being fueled for a static test? Delaying the entire lunar program by being a forced-in, unwieldy, oversized, over-complicated solution?