I am going to continue repeating back what I'm hearing tc anon and I'd appreciate it if you'd let me know if I'm following what you're saying. let me know if I over-generalize.

>>7588551
This is a visual element or structure designed to create an experience of human-to-human(bi-anthropomorphic) contact that evokes a change(delta) in mental(emotional) state.

pri - primitive, icon is icon. Pricon. A primitive icon to trigger something inside another person.

>>7588428
If you describe art as having two extremes in the year 2025 I think many of us would assume an image of a drawing that is strict while another is impulsive. Consequently, when you say "ethos" that seems coded as "not too tight, not too loose." Goldilocks.

for the congenital-deterministic reference it sounds like you're describing something that is inherited from a parent and creates some kind of determinism about an arbitrary art piece.

The stuff about vibrations sounds like you're constructing an axis of art with iconography on one end and realism on the other and tezukism is an example of something in the middle. It reads like "Realistic depictions vs. hieroglyphics" and cartoons are considered to be between.

>reconnect with child
undo/analyze conditioning
>cultivate white
cultivate inner voice. this sounds like something I would read from kimon nicolaides or a buddhist calendar. i know that sounds judgemental. I am trying to connect what you're saying to more familiar things that I think are apt comparisons.

>>7588514
This sounds like the use of computing language to meticulously communicate an understanding you have about how you draw.

I am noticing that this is partially a thread about
Osamu Tezuka or something and like chinese/japanese influences or something

it looks to me like people were expecting something more concrete and it's become unclear if this is a thread about drawing or philosophy.

thank you for the update tc anon.