Search Results
6/14/2025, 7:35:30 AM
>>507309806
>Why should I assume unicorns and god(s) exist?
This is where theists whip out their Gödels
>A1 Either a property or a negation is positive, but not both
>A2 A property necessarily implied by a positive property is positive
>T1 Positive properties are possibly exemplified
>D1 A unicorn-like being possesses positive properties
>A3 The property of being unicorn-like is positive
>C Possibly, unicorn exist
>A4 Positive properties are necessarily positive
>D2 An essence of an individual is a property possessed by it and necessarily implying any of its properties
>T2 Being unicorn-like is an essence of any unicorn-like being
>D3 Necessary existence of an individual is the necessary exemplification of all its essences
>A5 Necessary existence is a positive property
>T3 Necessarily unicorn exist
>Why should I assume unicorns and god(s) exist?
This is where theists whip out their Gödels
>A1 Either a property or a negation is positive, but not both
>A2 A property necessarily implied by a positive property is positive
>T1 Positive properties are possibly exemplified
>D1 A unicorn-like being possesses positive properties
>A3 The property of being unicorn-like is positive
>C Possibly, unicorn exist
>A4 Positive properties are necessarily positive
>D2 An essence of an individual is a property possessed by it and necessarily implying any of its properties
>T2 Being unicorn-like is an essence of any unicorn-like being
>D3 Necessary existence of an individual is the necessary exemplification of all its essences
>A5 Necessary existence is a positive property
>T3 Necessarily unicorn exist
Page 1