Search Results
7/26/2025, 9:15:53 AM
>>716470762
The latter two do nothing better as an actual infantryman's weapon anyway. The hyperburst on the AN-94 is a gimmick that you gain in exchange for being basically impossible to do proper field maintenance on (this is on top of the ones that were in service having shitty options for modernisation but realistically if they were put back into production someone could make a lightweight stable optic/light mount). P90 has worse ballistic performance than even short barreled 5.56 rifles, let alone a .300BLK gat; it could never defeat anything more than soft body armour, it couldn't even beat the Russian armour it was designed to defeat, which are much worse than modern ceramic plates.
There's basically nothing better as a main service rifle than a 11.5-14.5" AR-15 with a suppressor for the forseeable future of modern combat and the gun industry is designed around convincing potential contractees otherwise.
The latter two do nothing better as an actual infantryman's weapon anyway. The hyperburst on the AN-94 is a gimmick that you gain in exchange for being basically impossible to do proper field maintenance on (this is on top of the ones that were in service having shitty options for modernisation but realistically if they were put back into production someone could make a lightweight stable optic/light mount). P90 has worse ballistic performance than even short barreled 5.56 rifles, let alone a .300BLK gat; it could never defeat anything more than soft body armour, it couldn't even beat the Russian armour it was designed to defeat, which are much worse than modern ceramic plates.
There's basically nothing better as a main service rifle than a 11.5-14.5" AR-15 with a suppressor for the forseeable future of modern combat and the gun industry is designed around convincing potential contractees otherwise.
Page 1