Buddhism

>>17808597
Exactly, theology is midwit cope. It solves nothing.

>>17804740
>christcucks need to plagiarize the mythos of pagan chads

Belief isn’t the same as knowledge. Belief is when you think something is true, even if you can’t prove it. Knowledge is when you know it’s true because it’s clear, tested, or directly seen. Belief can be wrong. Knowledge can’t. Know the difference, don't confuse your belief for knowledge.

The constant debate in theology isn’t a sign of richness — it’s a glaring symptom of intellectual failure. It’s a playground for midwits who mistake complexity for truth and obscurity for depth. Thousands of years of arguing about made-up metaphysical blueprints with zero resolution or consensus. No other field would survive this level of non-delivery. It’s not profound, it’s parasitic — feeding on people's fear, ego, and need for meaning without ever producing anything real. Theological "thinkers" are like children arguing over the rules of a board game that doesn’t exist, each convinced their fantasy has divine authority.

Enlightenment traditions expose this for what it is — a noise machine to keep the mind busy and the self intact. Zen, Advaita, Taoism — they don't argue, they end argument. They strip away the nonsense, the personhood, the endless word games, and point directly to what’s real and prior to thought. That’s why theology will never touch them. It’s not just inferior — it’s the opposite. One clings to delusion and makes it academic. The other kills illusion entirely. One needs followers to validate itself. The other disappears when seen.

>>24487433

>>508138662

>>507970324
for you my illiterate zigger

.

if you need reasons to believe then you don’t actually believe.

you’re just using rationalizations to cope with the fear of not knowing.

midwits patch their doubt with fancy justifications so they can feel safe pretending they’ve got it all figured out.