Search Results
6/17/2025, 5:05:53 AM
>>2924419
>The configuration and the scale of art cannot be transposed into furniture and architecture. The intent of art is different from that of the latter, which must be functional. If a chair or a building is not functional, if it appears to be only art, it is ridiculous. The art of a chair is not its resemblance to art, but is partly its reasonableness, usefulness and scale as a chair ... A work of art exists as itself; a chair exists as a chair itself.
>Seat of stool immediately bows in and cracks in half when an adult male attempts to sit in it, as the entire frame of three-quarter inch softwood pine buckles and collapses in on itself
>The configuration and the scale of art cannot be transposed into furniture and architecture. The intent of art is different from that of the latter, which must be functional. If a chair or a building is not functional, if it appears to be only art, it is ridiculous. The art of a chair is not its resemblance to art, but is partly its reasonableness, usefulness and scale as a chair ... A work of art exists as itself; a chair exists as a chair itself.
>Seat of stool immediately bows in and cracks in half when an adult male attempts to sit in it, as the entire frame of three-quarter inch softwood pine buckles and collapses in on itself
Page 1