Search Results
6/7/2025, 9:24:12 PM
Skyline GTR R34 V-Spec II. No, I don't care its slow, rusty, unreliable, and fat. I wish it wasn't $120-200k. Its a genuinely beautiful car and I had a Bayside Blue GTR as my wallpaper in middle school several times. It has classic body lines and its as recognizable as a 68-70 Charger or 67-69 Camaro.
Most realistic is GC STi Wagons. I still think I should just buy that ver5 STi Sedan in Tampa for $18k if it didn't sell. GCs are one of those cars everyone loves when they drive one, Subaru got it "right" and everything else felt heavier and slower/more isolated after. I mean it was good enough for equinox.
NSX does nothing to do me. If I had to choose it'd be Supra and do a AutoX/Track build like the Ridox car. Modern single turbo EFR setup or stock twins with upgraded wheels. FD is too needy for me.
I owned a CT9A for 7 years and drove a CP9A. Awesome cars, but I want to try something different. Evo steering feel is unmatched. CP9A (V) is peak Evo because it feels smaller and nimbler than the CT9A (IX).
Most realistic is GC STi Wagons. I still think I should just buy that ver5 STi Sedan in Tampa for $18k if it didn't sell. GCs are one of those cars everyone loves when they drive one, Subaru got it "right" and everything else felt heavier and slower/more isolated after. I mean it was good enough for equinox.
NSX does nothing to do me. If I had to choose it'd be Supra and do a AutoX/Track build like the Ridox car. Modern single turbo EFR setup or stock twins with upgraded wheels. FD is too needy for me.
I owned a CT9A for 7 years and drove a CP9A. Awesome cars, but I want to try something different. Evo steering feel is unmatched. CP9A (V) is peak Evo because it feels smaller and nimbler than the CT9A (IX).
Page 1