>>935800215
It's still a no you. You're saying the same basic thing back at me with an additional, weak implication.
It's clear you were upset coming in here.
>No, I was definitely
That wasn't me, though, so again you're acting in petty rage, lashing out at everyone, thinking we are all the same person.
>I just genuinely thought
It's not about that, and here again you're trying to twist the truth. It's about the fact you keep trying to lie about basically everything happening in this thread in order to give yourself an artificial advantage. in reality, it's obvious you're lying, and you have nothing of importance to say.