>>714359989
Unironically, this

>>714098791
Tell that to the Consumer Rights Directive fucker, because EULA implicitly violates 2 key points necessary for it to be legally binding.

1. Written in a language your average retard understands, it isn't, EULA usually are written in lawyer speak in order to cover every edge case possible
2. Contract can't have any unfair terms, an EULA stating that you're given a license and it can be revoked at any time, this just being one of many unfair terms but the most obvious one for your smoothbrain to grasp