>>512018846
>This demonstrates deep incompetence at the executive management level and you should pressure them to fire these people.
I don't think that focusing on punishing the scapegoat will achieve anything, especially that it's literally impossible to enforce this. If this was political in nature, even if they fire some scapegoat that person will quietly land a new position somewhere else. Absolutely nothing will be achieved apart from signaling that it's ok to do so because the person that pulls the trigger will get a safe landing in a case when this generates some outrage and pushback.

Most likely this is political in nature because nobody climbs the global management corporate ladder by being a clueless bimbo that puts the company brand at risk just to virtue signal to some small group of 60 year old karens. This could be the case, but it's very unlikely.

It's not a coincidence that this happens as porn bans are pushed further. The goal seems to be to vastly restrict access to all porn media, be it video, games or printed comics. Just as US republicans have been shouting for months that it's what they're going to do to try to combat:
>rates of inceldom
>rates of NEETs
>low birthrates
>degeneracy
>rates of lonely 30/40 year old left over females that no man wants because they are too busy with porn
>crisis in military recruitment