>>715690691
it's POSSIBLE that these are radfems, but if you look at the overlap their supposed message has with extremist fundie christian nutjobs, then it becomes clear that this is a false flag and they're just pretending to be radfems; because we're at the point where third wave feminism is actually more socially acceptable than the brand of full-blown anti-sex wacko christianity is

Reminder that they want to enforce, via law, puritanical ideas regarding sex, meaning no sex before marriage, no sex for any purpose but procreation, no masturbation, and absolutely no porn or prostitution, of course. This message has very little purchase amongst 99.9% of the population here in the West, so they've set about astroturfing and false flagging and just plain fucking lying in order to try to get their way. It's why you keep hearing about "human trafficking" but really it's just them trying to equate kidnapping and slavery with prostitution and escorts. It's why they talk about "protecting children" but it's really about restricting or prohibiting access to pornography even to full grown adults. Right here they're just focusing on more commonly reviled sexual acts such as rape and incest, but that's just them getting their foot in the door, they want to ban ALL porn, ALL creative expression involving sex, and they won't stop until they succeed.

Im seriously asking

>>76318388
Mods, please destroy this thread. That is horrifying