>>716444682
>higher standards from art
I guarantee you don't. You're expressing a boilerplate opinion I see here all the time - the idea that if a character design isn't over the top sexy or wacky (if it's "safe horny"), it's bad. I'm an artfag and I simply respect a skillful illustrator. No art appreciator would deride this as "boring" and "bland." It's a classic porn-addicted weeb take that you only see here. You probably don't save art that you like, I'm certain you don't.