>>511138897
>>511138902
What baffles my mind is that those corporations must understand that lowering income - of the people who buy their shit - to such a low level that they cannot afford is equivalent to sawing off the branch they're sitting at?

These people who are supposedly more intelligent than us (thus "leading" businesses) cannot be so fucking shortsighted that they want to boost Q3 at cost of collapsing long term? Can they? Or is it a cascading effect of game theory where the dumbest mba at one company does it and then everyone else needs to follow suit as to not lose their faces in front of their dumbshit retard boomer investors ("but competitors line went up more than yours") which would be the real death kneel?

This suicidal practice needs to be studied and banned by law.