>>24482605
Heidegger is the authority, cuck boy

>>24477709
>Also your opinion is wrong btw
I don't think his opinion is necessarily wrong, as life context is usually important to really understand an author (look at Wittgenstein, an author one would expect one could read without secondary bibliography is responding in a large manner to the questions surrounding him in Vienna at the time, questions that help one understand his point in a deeper way -https://www.amazon.com/Wittgensteins-Vienna-Allan-Janik/dp/1566631327-) and authors positions usually change over time (look at Wittgenstein once again), but he's wrong regarding Aristotle in virtue of our hermeneutical distance. See pic related, from Heidegger's Nietzsche.
It's just a general advice one could give about any piece of text that's separated from our time, that's why, even if >>24477686 is a retard that didn't bother to google about Aristotle, he's giving sound hermeneutical advice. Hell, I'd argue we need hermeneutical ways to understand texts written just 100 years ago. Thinking our meaning is the same meaning of the ones behind us is naïve.