Search Results
7/2/2025, 11:37:58 PM
>>105780591
btw thanks a ton anon, for not only being the only one to show up to my ted talk but I had spent last night fucking with different ID3 tags and hadn't considered a different formatting option to be a solution. Not sure why it worked but GeetPT said this:
>Your typical Bluetooth headset probably has less than 1MB of RAM, often much less. Most of the storage capacity is on microSD cards or internal flash memory, whereas RAM is used for temporary data buffering and control processing.
>Devices with limited RAM or buffer sizes might struggle with larger clusters because they need to load bigger chunks of data, possibly causing delays or buffer underruns leading to playback looping.
Anything more than 192k CBR MP3 is failing to play so maybe this headset has 24KB of RAM? That might also explain why SBC through bluetooth sounds like ass, it's probably limited to 192k as well but it's nowhere near as good as LAME HQ encoding...
btw thanks a ton anon, for not only being the only one to show up to my ted talk but I had spent last night fucking with different ID3 tags and hadn't considered a different formatting option to be a solution. Not sure why it worked but GeetPT said this:
>Your typical Bluetooth headset probably has less than 1MB of RAM, often much less. Most of the storage capacity is on microSD cards or internal flash memory, whereas RAM is used for temporary data buffering and control processing.
>Devices with limited RAM or buffer sizes might struggle with larger clusters because they need to load bigger chunks of data, possibly causing delays or buffer underruns leading to playback looping.
Anything more than 192k CBR MP3 is failing to play so maybe this headset has 24KB of RAM? That might also explain why SBC through bluetooth sounds like ass, it's probably limited to 192k as well but it's nowhere near as good as LAME HQ encoding...
7/1/2025, 9:08:54 PM
>>105768892
I seems like this is the point of diminishing returns for webp. You can easily tell lossy compression occurred at 200% zoom but at 100% zoom I would probably say that both images are the same if you hid which one was JPG and which one was webp.
At 70% or lower the difference becomes pretty obvious thoughbeit.
I seems like this is the point of diminishing returns for webp. You can easily tell lossy compression occurred at 200% zoom but at 100% zoom I would probably say that both images are the same if you hid which one was JPG and which one was webp.
At 70% or lower the difference becomes pretty obvious thoughbeit.
6/21/2025, 5:56:33 PM
idziecie na marsz śledzia?
Page 1