Search Results
7/3/2025, 2:57:39 PM
>>63932410
The NFA, as determined by the Supreme Court, is only legal because it's a tax and not a gun law. If you aren't paying money to the government for the permission to do something, then it's no longer a tax - so at that point, you could argue to a court that it's just pointless and ask them to throw it out entirely.
It's wishful thinking, since the opposite logic was used by the Senate to remove the HPA and SHORT acts from the tax bill to begin with (that is to say, the NFA restrictions were seen as gun laws and NOT tax laws) - so "they" will very much pick and choose which definition to use based on what's convenient at the time.
The NFA, as determined by the Supreme Court, is only legal because it's a tax and not a gun law. If you aren't paying money to the government for the permission to do something, then it's no longer a tax - so at that point, you could argue to a court that it's just pointless and ask them to throw it out entirely.
It's wishful thinking, since the opposite logic was used by the Senate to remove the HPA and SHORT acts from the tax bill to begin with (that is to say, the NFA restrictions were seen as gun laws and NOT tax laws) - so "they" will very much pick and choose which definition to use based on what's convenient at the time.
Page 1