>>49465275
>true believers are quickly out-competed by those who're willing to take gambles
I'm not sure how willingness to take risks ties with not treating interactions as zero-sum games. Why would gamblers expect to play a zero-sum game less than people dealing with society? Those taking risks are acknowledging and leaning into an outside, unpredictable factor, but that factor can be applied to both zero-sum games and games that are not, so the attitude a risk-taker would take on social interactions seems disjointed from taking risks in itself and more on other personal beliefs.
Unless I'm missing something?