Search Results
8/3/2025, 10:28:49 PM
>>82066415
>There's an objective reality to the 85% reproduction rate for men and I think it's been well understood.
Voicing your incorrect viewpoints in an ambiguous way so that they can't be picked apart. I accept your dishonest concession.
Whatever aspect of objective reality you think you're pointing to (if you aren't just lying about having a "well understood" fact that supposedly justifies you making your point) has no affect on the truth value of the thread subject and the fact I presented.
Nothing about a 85% reproduction rate for men implies or suggests what percentage of those males were/are able to form successful sexual romantic relationships, which is the topic of the thread, which as I said hovers around 40% (pic related). (At one point it was 44, and 42 and so on. Which is exactly what is meant by the phrase "hovers around 40%" which it being 34% right now doesn't contradict what I said in any way.)
If you take my posts out of the context of the thread subject, then yes you were right. The number 85 does not equal the number 40. Very good. Now go lurk moar for all our sakes.
>There's an objective reality to the 85% reproduction rate for men and I think it's been well understood.
Voicing your incorrect viewpoints in an ambiguous way so that they can't be picked apart. I accept your dishonest concession.
Whatever aspect of objective reality you think you're pointing to (if you aren't just lying about having a "well understood" fact that supposedly justifies you making your point) has no affect on the truth value of the thread subject and the fact I presented.
Nothing about a 85% reproduction rate for men implies or suggests what percentage of those males were/are able to form successful sexual romantic relationships, which is the topic of the thread, which as I said hovers around 40% (pic related). (At one point it was 44, and 42 and so on. Which is exactly what is meant by the phrase "hovers around 40%" which it being 34% right now doesn't contradict what I said in any way.)
If you take my posts out of the context of the thread subject, then yes you were right. The number 85 does not equal the number 40. Very good. Now go lurk moar for all our sakes.
Page 1