Search Results
6/12/2025, 9:59:17 AM
>>40513641
>Oxygen is less than 0.001% of the exosphere; hydrogen and helium are 3/4ths and 1/4 of the exosphere
Another non sequitur. You’re supposed to be providing demonstrable evidence that gravity can prevent the gas pressure of earth’s atmosphere from diffusing UP and into a vacuum. spamming non sequiturs and avoiding the point isnt helping you here.
>You think 5.5* is enough to be of gravitational significance?
Lol! It’s 5.5x more than enough. If gravity can’t prevent something 5.5x heavier than air from diffusing up, it’s certainly not going to be able to prevent air from diffusing up and into a 10^-17 Torr vacuum
>There isn't really anything massive enough to show; you'll claim anything in space is fake.
If the best you can do when asked to substantiate your claim of the existence of gravity and the vacuum of space is to resort to reifying your own religious dogma with a textbook begging the question fallacy that’s pretty much a concession. gg.
>Why would I care about Gaussian surfaces?
Bc your claim that earth is a sphere which is not physically contained is falsified by the properties of earth's measurable electric field which require 2 parallel gaussian surfaces to be perpendicular to the electric field within physical containment. I’ve also proven the cause of the downward bias via the use of the 2nd Gaussian surface. gas pressure on earth provably requires physical containment (the firmament) and the only way to have a downward bias on earth is with physical containment (the firmament). This directly refutes your claims about gravity and the vacuum of space. in addition, a static charged spherical Earth would mean that the voltage potential is highest nearest the surface and attenuates according to R squared - not vice versa and lineally, as we observe. Since the field does not fall off in accordance with radial distribution, this is another property of the field which completely falsifies your position. that's gg.
>Oxygen is less than 0.001% of the exosphere; hydrogen and helium are 3/4ths and 1/4 of the exosphere
Another non sequitur. You’re supposed to be providing demonstrable evidence that gravity can prevent the gas pressure of earth’s atmosphere from diffusing UP and into a vacuum. spamming non sequiturs and avoiding the point isnt helping you here.
>You think 5.5* is enough to be of gravitational significance?
Lol! It’s 5.5x more than enough. If gravity can’t prevent something 5.5x heavier than air from diffusing up, it’s certainly not going to be able to prevent air from diffusing up and into a 10^-17 Torr vacuum
>There isn't really anything massive enough to show; you'll claim anything in space is fake.
If the best you can do when asked to substantiate your claim of the existence of gravity and the vacuum of space is to resort to reifying your own religious dogma with a textbook begging the question fallacy that’s pretty much a concession. gg.
>Why would I care about Gaussian surfaces?
Bc your claim that earth is a sphere which is not physically contained is falsified by the properties of earth's measurable electric field which require 2 parallel gaussian surfaces to be perpendicular to the electric field within physical containment. I’ve also proven the cause of the downward bias via the use of the 2nd Gaussian surface. gas pressure on earth provably requires physical containment (the firmament) and the only way to have a downward bias on earth is with physical containment (the firmament). This directly refutes your claims about gravity and the vacuum of space. in addition, a static charged spherical Earth would mean that the voltage potential is highest nearest the surface and attenuates according to R squared - not vice versa and lineally, as we observe. Since the field does not fall off in accordance with radial distribution, this is another property of the field which completely falsifies your position. that's gg.
Page 1