>>102399625
>Denies clear evidence right in front of his face
>Lies about how many posts criticized the watch or its price
>Refusing to buy something because it's overpriced is "defending it"
>Not LITERALLY JOINING FORCES with threadshitter antis to, and I quote, "shit on" anyone who DOES buy the watch, and telling seething brown raiders to gtfo, is also "defending it"
>"Every thread after the announcement defended it" he lies, provides no proof because he knows damn well that on the contrary, he and his fellow monkeys were spamming the catalog with watch bait threads for weeks
Sorry anon, but these are all pretty damning admissions on your part.
Looks like I've proven you wrong yet again. The fact that you've had to completely change your position, shift the goalposts and grasp THIS hard for the scraps of a case makes it pretty clear we didn't "love it" like you claimed and weren't running damage control on the catalog like you pretended we were. That's why you had to equivocate "not buying the watch but also not indulging the deranged monkeys' effeminate need for emotional validation because you're irrelevant, dysgenic losers" with "loving" and "defending" the watch - because you're backed into a corner and desperate.
Sorry you did this to yourself. Maybe stop making shit up without looking at the evidence first?