>>24576437

I'm sure the reasons you provided would have much more to do with an infatuation (as a non-member) with the intellectual class, as described by Gouldner, ironically not accounting for the possibility that you see things the way you do, because of your class membership. I really don't know how Marxists can qualify Marx as something material and non-mystical, within the frame Marx provides. So he alone was able to see beyond his class consciousness? Why? Because he was a fat smelly kike? Here's the real deal anon, you're some member of genus homo. Maybe not necessarily sapiens, maybe erectus, but the genus none the less. That species of animal evolved for endurance running. Just like a dog owner that lets his fido become obese is doing something unnatural and cruel, something that prevents the animal from exhibiting its nature, a fat weakling like you or Marx, also doesn't qualify for being fully human. Go outside and do me some laps around the block. Once you're no longer a disgusting fat body, then you can talk to me about how humans are supposed to behave. Not before. You belong to the class consciousness of obesity rn. There's no more false a consciousness for our speciex than that one.

Tl;dr only humand with a healthy body fat% are capable of making valid points on anything.