Search Results
6/7/2025, 11:09:53 PM
>>39952263
I am glad to have all of you around, I think we have a pretty awesome general going overall.
>>39952389
>Thank you for replying.
I always will eventually.
>But if I call it autism, people suddenly understand me better, even if they don't act differently.
Valid!
>Unfortunately, I've tried that and been completely ignored.
Okay, I gotta be frank: In cases like that the best you can do is move on from those people. Cause I have been there too. And, since lifetime is finite, harsh as it sounds, sometimes the best we can do is cut our losses with some people.
>it's related to a failure on my part to phrase something in an appropriate tone.
>The silence mentioned in my other post tells me that there will be no forgiveness.
Yeah. I need to be frank with you, from where I stand none of this is on you. In brief, you are absolutely NOT the problem in all of this. If anything, you have given them more than enough chances. One of the things you definitely, urgently need are people aren't you that aren't shitty.
>>39952404
>wdym by approach?
You answered perfectly, no worries.
A caloric intake of 1000 is pretty low, and using nic as an appetite suppressant on top of that in conjunction with it might have tipped the scales in their interpretation. Especially having days of only 500 in between is a bit extreme. There are good reasons to increase your intake for several reasons, one being that if your body ends up entering some panic starvation mode you are risking increased risk of binging but also a high chance of yoyoing once you hit target weight. Try, for a while, a caloric intake of 1000-1250, being strict with yourself to adhere to the lower limit just as you would be with the upper limit. You should continue to see a loss of about 250-500g per week with this, although you can't trust averaging over only one week in my experience, after two or three you would know for sure. This would clear you of any ED suspicions afaict.
I am glad to have all of you around, I think we have a pretty awesome general going overall.
>>39952389
>Thank you for replying.
I always will eventually.
>But if I call it autism, people suddenly understand me better, even if they don't act differently.
Valid!
>Unfortunately, I've tried that and been completely ignored.
Okay, I gotta be frank: In cases like that the best you can do is move on from those people. Cause I have been there too. And, since lifetime is finite, harsh as it sounds, sometimes the best we can do is cut our losses with some people.
>it's related to a failure on my part to phrase something in an appropriate tone.
>The silence mentioned in my other post tells me that there will be no forgiveness.
Yeah. I need to be frank with you, from where I stand none of this is on you. In brief, you are absolutely NOT the problem in all of this. If anything, you have given them more than enough chances. One of the things you definitely, urgently need are people aren't you that aren't shitty.
>>39952404
>wdym by approach?
You answered perfectly, no worries.
A caloric intake of 1000 is pretty low, and using nic as an appetite suppressant on top of that in conjunction with it might have tipped the scales in their interpretation. Especially having days of only 500 in between is a bit extreme. There are good reasons to increase your intake for several reasons, one being that if your body ends up entering some panic starvation mode you are risking increased risk of binging but also a high chance of yoyoing once you hit target weight. Try, for a while, a caloric intake of 1000-1250, being strict with yourself to adhere to the lower limit just as you would be with the upper limit. You should continue to see a loss of about 250-500g per week with this, although you can't trust averaging over only one week in my experience, after two or three you would know for sure. This would clear you of any ED suspicions afaict.
Page 1