>>529765835
>Total weapons on board and hardpoints.
That's not true. Look at your pic and pic rel. The Yak-130 due to the landing gear bay configuration has lost the central underfuselage wet tubed hard point that the M-346 retains. The second hardpoint isn't used but still retained on the m-346 since during testing it showed to have adverse effect on the flight envelope of the plane (russians don't really care).
And regarding the wingtip hardpoints that are present on both the M-346 and the yak, on the yak they are essentially lost since they weren't able to develop a true fighter attack version (yak-131) so they had to put the flares on the wingtips.
This leaves the yak with 4 useful hardpoints for ordnance if they don't carry any extra fuel (unrealistic). While the M-346FA can have 5 hardpoints with ordnance with an extra fuel tank or a TGP/EW/RECCE pod. (or 4 weapons and 2/3 extra fuel)
Not to mention that due to russian engines whenever you put any kind of load on the yak the T/W ratio goes lower than a fully fueled L-39.
>>529767035
>bombing civilians who at most have some FGC-9s
Jesus.