Search Results
6/9/2025, 11:16:41 AM
>>40498536
>we can use telescopes to observe many objects in space the majority of which are spheres.
See:
https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/40259436/#40292800
>its not a great leap in logic to deduce ours is similar.
Yes it is. What do the lights on your ceiling tell you of the floor beneath your feet? The earth is provably in the center of the cosmos which means it’s provably unique, as in, not like everything which revolves around it. There is no logic to the notion that bc we see little round objects in the sky, the earth must be a big round object. The only reason it seems rational to you is the same reason Mormons believe their views of the prophet Joseph Smith to be rational - bc you, like most religious individuals, were born into a system of indoctrination and youve known nothing other than that doctrine your entire life. It’s illogical and nonsensical by definition, but you believe bc it’s what you’ve been taught and you never thought to question it.
>as we observe these other objects move through space around the sun
You don’t observe objects move thru space around the sun. You observe everything moving around the earth in repeating cycles and you do not experience the earth moving at all. Again, it’s a lifetime of indoctrination which has conditioned you to believe you see things moving around the sun. Objectively tho, you do not.
>it seems to apply an attractive force to them, which forces them change their trajectory in usually predictable ways. i dont believe the effects of density and bouyancy would explain this phenomena
The accelerative downward bias only makes sense on flat earth with a firmament. See the posts linked to itp:
>>40496037
We can replicate and experimentally prove the flat earth electrostatic model of “gravity”. The globe earth heliocentric model is pure pseudoscientific fiction which has not, and can never be, proven.
cont…
>we can use telescopes to observe many objects in space the majority of which are spheres.
See:
https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/40259436/#40292800
>its not a great leap in logic to deduce ours is similar.
Yes it is. What do the lights on your ceiling tell you of the floor beneath your feet? The earth is provably in the center of the cosmos which means it’s provably unique, as in, not like everything which revolves around it. There is no logic to the notion that bc we see little round objects in the sky, the earth must be a big round object. The only reason it seems rational to you is the same reason Mormons believe their views of the prophet Joseph Smith to be rational - bc you, like most religious individuals, were born into a system of indoctrination and youve known nothing other than that doctrine your entire life. It’s illogical and nonsensical by definition, but you believe bc it’s what you’ve been taught and you never thought to question it.
>as we observe these other objects move through space around the sun
You don’t observe objects move thru space around the sun. You observe everything moving around the earth in repeating cycles and you do not experience the earth moving at all. Again, it’s a lifetime of indoctrination which has conditioned you to believe you see things moving around the sun. Objectively tho, you do not.
>it seems to apply an attractive force to them, which forces them change their trajectory in usually predictable ways. i dont believe the effects of density and bouyancy would explain this phenomena
The accelerative downward bias only makes sense on flat earth with a firmament. See the posts linked to itp:
>>40496037
We can replicate and experimentally prove the flat earth electrostatic model of “gravity”. The globe earth heliocentric model is pure pseudoscientific fiction which has not, and can never be, proven.
cont…
Page 1