Search Results
6/12/2025, 12:51:02 AM
>>95850266
>Thank you for proving with your own logic that you were being wildly disingenuous.
I'm not. I'm pointing out that even though doing so may "seem" like it's doing something, the only people it actually destroys are those who are unwilling to take the olive branch from the others who were ostracized.
For the rest it's basically like you're exiling people from a fantasy town while also worried about a growing bandit problem in the nearby woods. The failure to stop and consider that maybe these two events could be related is what I am asking you to do.
>Meanwhile, conservatives took legal action, physically stole books, and ALSO ostracized. During an era where it worked much better.
>your people
I am not a conservative, nor was I alive in the 80s, nor would I have done such things if I somehow was a 40-60 year old conservative, nor am I a therapist so I can't really help you with your trauma.
I am more aligned with the Free Culture Movement and a supporter of what the Cypherpunks used to stand for when they were more of a thing (though I'm not a skilled tech person - just more of a dabbler, so the most I can do is use Linux, promote the ideals when it's relevant, and scrape together something to throw in a donation button once in a while.) So I am very anti-censorship.
I imagine if we met in a different thread we might get along. One of the perks of being anon, I guess.
>>95850313
It's very easy to tell when people are pretending to be in any media industry because they act like going to art school has been a good idea since the... fuck, 70s? Maybe early 80s at the latest.
>>95850578
You know he would insist on being DM instead and be the kind who is unbearably boring and bland about it.
>So, consider the situation for a moment. Let's say, hypothetically, you were walking down the stone steps into the dungeon. Let's say, you have a torch. Let's say, hypothetically, you can see 60ft in front of you. Roll a d20.
>Thank you for proving with your own logic that you were being wildly disingenuous.
I'm not. I'm pointing out that even though doing so may "seem" like it's doing something, the only people it actually destroys are those who are unwilling to take the olive branch from the others who were ostracized.
For the rest it's basically like you're exiling people from a fantasy town while also worried about a growing bandit problem in the nearby woods. The failure to stop and consider that maybe these two events could be related is what I am asking you to do.
>Meanwhile, conservatives took legal action, physically stole books, and ALSO ostracized. During an era where it worked much better.
>your people
I am not a conservative, nor was I alive in the 80s, nor would I have done such things if I somehow was a 40-60 year old conservative, nor am I a therapist so I can't really help you with your trauma.
I am more aligned with the Free Culture Movement and a supporter of what the Cypherpunks used to stand for when they were more of a thing (though I'm not a skilled tech person - just more of a dabbler, so the most I can do is use Linux, promote the ideals when it's relevant, and scrape together something to throw in a donation button once in a while.) So I am very anti-censorship.
I imagine if we met in a different thread we might get along. One of the perks of being anon, I guess.
>>95850313
It's very easy to tell when people are pretending to be in any media industry because they act like going to art school has been a good idea since the... fuck, 70s? Maybe early 80s at the latest.
>>95850578
You know he would insist on being DM instead and be the kind who is unbearably boring and bland about it.
>So, consider the situation for a moment. Let's say, hypothetically, you were walking down the stone steps into the dungeon. Let's say, you have a torch. Let's say, hypothetically, you can see 60ft in front of you. Roll a d20.
Page 1