>>105724695
>null fundamentally the same thing as 0
>unless you're comparing numerically explicitly
>which is indicated by no major syntactical difference such as type definition or casting, only the implicit understanding that once set of characters casts to a numeric value while the another near identical set doesn't
Yes, the problem is with every other language, not soft typed abominations made for people that can't understand variable types.
Clearly the logical system with esoteric and illogical rules is not at fault here.