>>17830724
>nuh-uh
Contradictions are false, this is why dialectics is anti-logical, you don't actually know something opposes something else because of dialectics, you have to know it beforehand to even apply it to dialectics, not everything has to negate itself
>Nuh-uh
I am, at my core, myself without others, and others are, at their core, themselves without me. Our interactions may influence me, but that influence does not and cannot exist without me already existing.
>Esotericism
Okay
>Feudalism enslaving man to a hierarchy is "falsehood" ?
Yes, but not for the reasons you think. My argument is that every contradiction is people being retarded and to digress, hierarchy is actually good, and you're retarded for thinking otherwise.
>You're saying that if every person in that government were to go on vacation, they wouldn't have consciousness of being on vacation ? And you think that their will or desires wouldn't be affected at all by this newfound condition?
I'm saying that there is no ''Their'' will, they each individually have wills alone, ''Their Will'' and ''Their Consciousness'' is literally nothing more than said wills and consciousnesses interacting with each other, likely within a hierarchy.
Groups by themselves cannot exist as they are social constructs, people can. Same with collective will, it's a social construct to call the interactions between people's individual wills.