Search Results
7/23/2025, 2:48:30 AM
>>17864616
>ANE carried the genes for blonde hair for thousands of years before that
do you understand the english language? studies have proven that rs12821256 does not contribute much to blond hair
you can see here that rs1667394 in oca2 has higher chances of giving you blonde hairs why isn't that the "blonde hair gene" , rs1805007 has higher chances of giving you blonde hairs why isn't that the "blonde hair gene"?
>SHG picked up the trait from ANE and subjected it to strong positive selection.
no, shgs had low or no frequency of that snp, not even the NEO27 had it
>The fact is that SHG were completely wiped out, our ancestors were subjected to the same selection sweep independently thousands of years later, SHG have basically nothing to do with modern European populations.
shg-like populations contributed to modern europeans
>ANE carried the genes for blonde hair for thousands of years before that
do you understand the english language? studies have proven that rs12821256 does not contribute much to blond hair
you can see here that rs1667394 in oca2 has higher chances of giving you blonde hairs why isn't that the "blonde hair gene" , rs1805007 has higher chances of giving you blonde hairs why isn't that the "blonde hair gene"?
>SHG picked up the trait from ANE and subjected it to strong positive selection.
no, shgs had low or no frequency of that snp, not even the NEO27 had it
>The fact is that SHG were completely wiped out, our ancestors were subjected to the same selection sweep independently thousands of years later, SHG have basically nothing to do with modern European populations.
shg-like populations contributed to modern europeans
Page 1