>>40498536
Also,
See: >>40481935
and
https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/40294514/#40369611

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/503272287/#503278805

https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/503272287/#503279073

All of the most famous and credentialed physicists, cosmologists and astronomers will tell you point blank there is not a single observation which can be made which is evidence against geocentrism. In fact, Einstein was literally forced to admit that heliocentrism was equally valid kinematically and dynamically to geocentrism. You should consider educating yourself on these matters more thoroughly. You can start with the links ive already provided and the sections referenced in the pastebin, in the above links ive replied to you with already, and itp:
>>40463337

>ultimately, i think a model of reality should be judged on how the accuracy of the predictions it can make.
If you honestly feel this way you’ll be a flat earther soon enough. Seems the main issue here is you just haven’t looked into what predictions the globe /heliocentric model have actually attempted to make.

>flat earth doesnt have a model, just speculation, and thus cant make any predictions.
Straw man and provably false. Literally all technology in existence is built and utilized assuming earth is a flat stationary topographical plane. Earth measures flat and motionless, but don’t just blindly believe me or anyone else on that, go test it yourself:
>>40435656
>>40435684

If, when your referring to a flat earth model, you’re actually inquiring about a flat earth map see:
https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/40294514/#40339386
https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/40294514/#40341993

cont..