>>11476033
Does that mean the 1:1 scale dolls have to be stored naked? I like how this Jill looks for photos, but it's just too awkward inviting company over knowing someone could shit their pants seeing a naked woman hiding out in the closet.

(And then trying to explain that I literally bought a sex doll because I ironically like portrait /p/hotography)

>>11474533
Real talk though, do the dolls come with the outfits, because I'd actually enjoy this "toy" photography if the faces aren't actually uncanny af in person